Go to Google Home
Web    Images    Groups    News    FroogleNew!    more »
  Advanced Search
   Preferences    
Search:  the webpages from the UK
 Web 
Results 1 - 10 of about 269 for S J Patel 2 Wickham Avenue Shirley. (0.14 seconds) 
Lying Solicitors 2
 (because of your obnoxious client’s threats of physical violence) You are to inform your client SJ Patel 2 Wickham Ave Shirley, that he too, is not welcome on MY doorstep www.croydoncouncil.info/page19.html - 32k - Cached - Similar pages
Lying Solicitors
 SJ Patel 2 Wickham Avenue Shirley CR0 8TY, managed to sell the freehold  of  the shop with all its faults and disputes to a certain Fineland Properties,.
 www.croydoncouncil.info/page18.html - 30k - Cached - Similar pages
IWG Home
 I have been in dispute with a certain SJ Patel 2 Wickham Avenue, Shirley Croydon., the obnoxious lying person who bought the freehold to my property exactly two yrs ago
 www.ingramwintergreen.co.uk/ - 28k - Cached - Similar pages
2 Daniel Ginsbury Lying Solicitor
 that ALL The conditions that were imposed by me in The matter of my dispute with
 The previous owner of The freehold, Suryakant J Patel 2 Wickham Avenue Shirley .www.ingramwintergreen.co.uk/page3.html - Supplemental Result - Similar pages
[ More results from www.ingramwintergreen.co.uk ]
Hate Mail is NOT a crime
 S J Patel . . The freeholder. Home address 2 Wickham Avenue Shirley Croydon. Had sold her the shop under a number of false pretenses . . . stirring up racial hatred
 www.metpolicecroydon.co.uk/page4.html - 23k - Cached - Similar pages
Result Page: 
wp9f9cae16.gif
wp8a05bae6.gif
1
Free! Get the Google Toolbar. Download Now - About Toolbar
 Google Toolbar

©2005 Google
2 Dennis Matthews
 Did you or did you not conspire with your client SJ Patel of 2 Wickham Avenue, Shirley and with Ingram Winter Green Solicitors Islington, to LIE to me in the matter of the sale of the above property
 www.dennissmatthews.co.uk/page2.html - 22k - 6 Sep 2005 - Cached - Similar pages
Google Search: denniss matthews anerley
 on behalf of their client SJ Patel, 2 Wickham Avenue, Shirley. . . that ... www.lawyerbaiting.co.uk/ - 18k - 25 Jul 2005 - Cached - Similar pages ...
 www.dennissmatthews.co.uk/page4.html - 27k - Cached - Similar pages
2 Dennis Matthews
 Catherine Spence Solicitor at Denniss Matthews, Anerley SE20 . . . or . .  the lying scheming, conniving piece of pig shit is Suryakant J Patel of 2 Wickham Ave Shirley
 www.ingramwintergreen.org/page6.html - 21k - 6 Sep 2005 - Cached - Similar pages
Lying Solicitors
 ... Solicitors, 145 Anerley Rd SE20 on behalf of their client SJ Patel, 2 Wickham
 Avenue, Shirley. . . that contention is based on the fact that all of them ...
 www.lawyerbaiting.co.uk/ - 20k - Cached - Similar pages
MSN Search: daniel ginsbury
 The people to whom your client SJ Patel, 2 Wickham Avenue Shirley...
 www.croydoncouncil.info/page18a.html. ·. Cached page. ·. Front Page ..CLUEDO
 www.lawyerbaiting.co.uk/page6.html - 41k - Cached - Similar pages
Visit Local Government Ombudsman Watch , or L.G.O Watch the site that tells you the truth about this corrupt biased toothless lot who are supposed to oversee the Local Councils . . .
Click here   http://www.ombudsmanwatch.org/
Read what the Law Society say about SPOOF/PARODY SITES such as these and those of  Rick Kordowski and his Moss and Coleman sites. Click here.
“ I am going to presume that Denniss Matthews Solicitors Anerley along with Ingram Winter Green Solicitors Bedford House and their clients Suryakant J Patel 2 Wickham Avenue Shirley and Fineland Properties Ltd, 43 Vincent Court (also known as Fine Land Properties Ltd. 2 Hillcrest Av. NW11 or Fineland Properties Ltd C/O Messrs Elliot Woolfe & Ros, Equity Hse, Edgeware ) . . . Reg owners Ruth Teitelbaum, 28 Overlea Road London, E5 9BG and Nathan Teitlebaum, Crest House, 34 Hillcrest Avenue, London NW11 0EN, CONSPIRED to lie, deceive and defraud me of my considerable claims in the matter of this dispute. . . See why ? .  . . Click here
HOW FAMOUS DO YOU WANT TO BE NATHAN TEITELBAUM and RUTH TEITELBAUM?
AS FAMOUS AS THE LAST FREEHOLDER?
Metropolitan  Police give whole new meaning to . . . “Getting a Brazilian”

These sites were created because Solicitors Ingram Winter Green and Denniss Matthews  will not respond to my many letters, and because The Law Society will not investigate all this:-
 The reason these sites are still here presumably, is because they are ALL not willing to answer the simple question . . “Did you or did you not conspire with your clients, S J Patel, Nathan & Ruth Teitelbaum of Fineland Properties Ltd,  to deliberately LIE, CHEAT and DECEIVE in order to DEFRAUD me of my  considerable claims against them?” . . well not in Court anyway. . . lying is one thing . . perjury another.  All the content of these sites is based on that premise, and NONE of it has ever been denied or even contested.
 For the removal of doubt, I have never called Daniel J Ginsbury “a lying, conniving, scheming piece of pig shit, low life life gutter scum”.
I merely ask the question? If all of the above is true would that make him one? Daniel Ginsbury declines to ans either the former or the latter. It is true that I accuse IWG of being a bunch of total Wankers for allowing these sites to be here and are not able to fathom a way out of this dilemma. Not worthy to call themselves Solicitors in fact.

DISCLAIMER . .  Click here

My claims made on this  and other web sites are based on the fact that Metcalfe Copeman & Pettefar
( MCP Law ) refuse to answer even the most basic of questions. They should have no reason, unless to do so would embarrass them or their clients in disclosure of lies, connivance, and conspiracy. In exactly the same fashion as the IWG, Denniss Matthews conspiracy. I have asked them over and over again to tell the truth but they have declined.
It is reasonable and correct therefore to make the assumptions that I have and that are printed through out these sites. MCP Law still have the opportunity to refute these claims if they wish . . . Provided they can prove it that is. . .

NOTICE TO ALL search engine, ISP’s, Nominet, Hosting Co’s, domain name providers and the like. ANY adverse legal content on my sites Is AT LEAST ONE YEAR OLD but more likely 2 years, and therefore is EXEMPT from prosecution in ANY form under UK Law by virtue of being OUT of STATUTE. Please ignore any threats of legal action. .They will just be ‘trying it on’..Besides it’s ALL true otherwise they would have sued me.as per justice.gov.ukGoogle search  defamation limitation.Pre-action Protocol for Defamation In particular, time is always ‘of the essence’ in defamation claims; the limitation period is (uniquely) only 1 year,  .www.justice.gov.uk/civil/procrules_fin/contents/protocols/prot_def.htm