THIS not THAT is what is SUPPOSED to happen for an unknown (to the auctioneer . . . from sworn evidence) person to buy a property over the telephone. . (whether or not the actual bidder is known to them)
These rules are taken from a typical Auctioneers site. . . and are pretty much universal
. . . . they are similar to Barnett Ross rules which are not listed on the inter-
TERMS & CONDITIONS FOR TELEPHONE AND PROXY BIDDERS . . We do provide a Proxy and
Telephone Bidding Service if you are unable to bid personally. Detailed instruction
forms can be downloaded from this website or are available from our Offices
Where a prospective Buyer is unable to attend an Auction sale, or any part thereof,
he/she may send a signed bid (the form is blank) on the reverse of this form, together
with the maximum price he/she is prepared to authorise (there was NO MAX price)the
Auctioneer to bid on his/her behalf, or arrange for the Auctioneer to conduct a telephone
bid. The Auctioneer will not exceed the maximum bidding figure under any circumstances.
The instruction to bid should be accompanied by a bank or building society draft
representing 10% of the maximum bid price (plus the administration fee of £350).
(there is none) If the bid price is £20,000 or less then the minimum deposit is £2,350
(including the £350 administration fee).
If the bid price is less than £2,000 then
the full purchase price (plus the £350 administration fee) is payable. Should the
Lot be bought for less than the maximum bid price then the surplus of the deposit
will be deducted from the balance due on completion.
In compliance with the Money Laundering Act all successful bidders are required to
provide photographic identification and proof of address. . . (there are NO FORMS
WHATSOEVER that comply with MONEY LAUNDERING RULES or even signatures of either
Andrew Mahon OR Aunty OR UNCLE or ANY proof whatsoever that any of them even exist)
Telephone
and proxy Bidders should enclose copies of a photographic
identity document such as a current passport or UK driving licence and a utility
bill/building society or bank statement/credit card statement or any other form of
identity document that has been issued in the last three months that provides evidence
of residency at the correspondence address stated under the Buyers details overleaf.
Telephone bidders acting on behalf of another party will need to provide the documents
detailed above for both themselves and the named Buyer, together with a valid letter
of authority authorising you to bid on the Buyers behalf. (NONE OF THIS is in the
file . . the form that should have shown it is blank with a bit of scribble in the
margin)
Telephone bidders acting on behalf of a company should provide the above documents
for themselves (THERE ARE NONE)together with a written authority from the company.
(THERE ARE NONE)
Completed bidding forms, (THERE ARE NO SIGNATURES on a virtual blank form) accompanying drafts and necessary proof of identity should be sealed inside an envelope clearly marked on the outside with the Auction date, venue and Lot number to which the bid refers. The envelope must also state in the top left hand corner whether the instructions are for Proxy or Telephone Bidding.
Telephone bidding forms will be opened in advance of the Auction as they require verification of the contact telephone number and arrangements will need to be made in advance by the auctioneer to provide this service.
It will be assumed that a bid is to be made by telephone if the method of bidding is not clearly indicated on the outside of the sealed envelope and, consequently, the envelope will be opened upon receipt.
Bidding forms should be sent, or delivered by hand, to any Ccccc Eeeeee Office at
least 24 hours before any Sale, unless otherwise agreed. If sending the form and
draft by Recorded Delivery then please allow extra time as this service will take
longer than ordinary first class post. If a telephone/proxy bidder wishes to bid
for more than one Lot then separate forms must be completed for each Lot, with the
draft for the total deposits (including administration fees for each Lot) and the
necessary proof of identity sealed inside the envelope depicting the first Lot Number
for which you are bidding.
A telephone or proxy bid must be to an exact figure, ie, the wording “one hundred
pounds over the highest bid in the room” would not be acceptable. (or a figure of
“NO MAX” as was the case here)
The Auctioneer reserves the right not to bid on behalf
of the telephone/proxy bidder should there be any error, confusion (either apparent
or otherwise) in respect of the instructions or accompanying draft. The Auctioneer
undertakes not to “run” the bidding above the reserve and will on the telephone/proxy
bidder’s behalf against those present in the room (and against any other telephone/proxy
bids he may receive on that Lot) to the limit of his instructions.
YET MCP Law say their client’s Aunty and Uncle were able to buy this property, through the patronage of plaintiff 1’s ‘fixer’ . . . . without having to go through ANY of the above. . . . . . . what an INCREDIBLE story . . . . . SWORN ON OATH TO THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. . . . by both plaintiffs and MCP’s J Burton and presented to the Court by Sarah Adlam and her pet Barrister Matthew Hutchings as FACT.
BUT I’m saving THE BEST DOCUMENT OF ALL till later. . . . That REALLY is INCREDIBLE . . it needs to go in a museum . . . . . it’s the only one of it’s kind.
AND IF A REALLY BRIGHT POLICEMAN or even a reporter has followed these links all way from
www.sir-
www.metpolicelondon.co.uk . . . or
www.metpolicecroydon.co.uk . . . or any one of my other numerous sites . . he
/she will not even need to ask MCP . . . . to see the files. . . . . and with permission
of The High Court of Justice Queens Bench will be able to see the documents I mention
above. . . . .
But the game is . . . See if you can spot THE INCREDIBLE DOCUMENT ?
Answers to par84colin@hotmail.com . . . . . give you a clue . . . it’s more than
one page . . . but you wouldn’t know it from the file . . . which is why it fooled
me at 1st. . .
For court documents filed post 2 October 2006 non-
The rule comes into play once all
defendants have filed either an acknowledgment of service or a defence, where the
claim has been listed for hearing or where judgment has been entered. Non-
“Now what’s the chances of that happening.”
You sure you don’t want to drop this case and THEN settle MCP? Before a bright detective gets this far?
Or worse Google finds you,
It might keep some of you out of prison or being disbarred. Pick up that phone?
For the removal of doubt, I have never called Daniel J Ginsbury “a lying, conniving, scheming piece of pig shit, low life life gutter scum”.
I merely ask the question? If all of the above is true would that make him one? Daniel Ginsbury declines to ans either the former or the latter. It is true that I accuse IWG of being a bunch of total Wankers for allowing these sites to be here and are not able to fathom a way out of this dilemma. Not worthy to call themselves Solicitors in fact.
DISCLAIMER . . Click here
My claims made on this and other web sites are based on the fact that Metcalfe Copeman
& Pettefar ( MCP Law ) refuse to answer even the most basic of questions. They should
have no reason, unless to do so would embarrass them or their clients in disclosure
of lies, connivance, and conspiracy. In exactly the same fashion as the IWG, Denniss
Matthews conspiracy. I have asked them over and over again to tell the truth but
they have declined. It is reasonable and correct therefore to make the assumptions
that I have and that are printed through out these sites. MCP Law still have the
opportunity to refute these claims if they wish . . . Provided they can prove it
that is.
In fact the reason they didn’t refute them . . . is they were true. Lisa Richardson
DID Conspire to Defraud.
Their clients DID NOT buy the property at AUCTION and they
DID know about the dispute when they AGREED to buy the property. In fact they bought
the property BECAUSE of the dispute. . . . All this has been sworn to under OATH
by Jonathan Burton Solicitor at MCP. . . . But he calls it . . . . “Was not meant
to deceive.”
http://www.rrrrrrrrs-
The Monday Laundering Regulations 2003 came into force on Monday 1st March 2004.
These regulations cover the activities of many service providers, including Estate
Agents and Auctioneers.
As with banks, IFA's and other professional service providers,
we are now required to obtain proof of the buyer's identity. This means all successful
buyer's must provide proof of identity and residency to the Auctioneers immediately
after the fall of the hammer, when completing the Memorandum of Sale.
All our auctions
are affected by this legislation. The following information details the documents
accepted for proof of identity and proof of residency, 1 (one) document is required
from each listing.
Proof of identity
current signed UK/EU passport
current full UK/EU
Photo card driving licence
current full UK Driving licence (old style)
resident permit
issued by the Home Office to EU Nationals
Inland Revenue Tax Notification statement
containing current address
Firearms certificate
Proof of address
current full UK/EU
Photo card driving licence
current full UK driving licence (old style)
a utility
bill issued within the last three months (excluding mobile phone bills)
Local Authority
tax bill -
Bank, Building Society or Credit Union containing
current address
The most recent original mortgage statement from a UK lender
* Please note that a provisional Driving Licence will not be accepted, it must be
a FULL licence.
* A Driving Licence can only be used as evidence of identity OR address
but not for both
If the purchaser's details are different from the successful bidder,
the purchaser must then provide proof of identity and residency to their solicitor,
a copy of this will be requested by us following the auction.
NONE of the above is
in this file. NOT EVEN a signature from either Aunty or Uncle or Andrew Mahon.
NOTHING
. . . . . .
Usage Statistics for mcp-
Summary Period: Last 12 Months
Generated 18-
There could be trouble ahead
BARNETTROSS Notice to all bidders (In RED)
14. PROOF OF IDENTIFICATION The purchaser
and/or bidder is to provide original documentation to confirm proof of name and address.
Please refer to page 1 for acceptable documentation.
Page 1
The purchaser and bidder
is to provide one original document from each column together with a copy for us
to attach to the contract.
NO NO NO NO NO . . . . Have a word with Steve and he’ll make sure you don’t have
to bother with ANY of that stuff. Or have to fill in a telephone / proxy bidding
form. . . He’ll do it for you . . . . . Haven’t thought of a name to call yourselves
. . . Don’t worry he’ll think one up for you . . . . . hhmmmm let’s see . . How
about RIDACO Developments . . . Does that have a nice ring to it?. . . . Ok no
problem . . . Ridaco Developments it is then . . Don’t know Stevie ??? . . . .,contact
Andy“well known to the auctioneers” Mahon in Northern Ireland.
02868 632102 / 07775
665878 and he’ll show you how to avoid all those nasty forms.
Barnett Ross Auctioneers.
Wankers @ IWG recommend Barnett Ross at the Radisson Portman
Hotel. We laugh at Money Laundering Regulations.
No identification documents necessary.
No signature required. We make up a name for you too.
Steven Grossman makes sure YOU
get the property.
Contact Andrew Mahon Northern Ireland for details.
2006
2008
In the history of the known World. Has one dealer in ANY commodity, EVER purchased
a property from ANOTHER dealer, knowing full well there was something wrong with
it. And PAID THE FULL PRICE?
The answer is of course NO. . . . unless your Irish
of course.
Colin’s NEW sites
Barnett Ross the no forms required to bid Auctioneers.
Contact Andrew
Mahon NI plaintiff 1’s chief fixer for details.
He knows Steven Grossman so doesn’t
have to fill out all those nasty Money Laundering forms.
Or ANY forms come to that.
www.barnett-
(Andrew Mahon
3 Pettigo Rd, Kesh,
Co
Fermanagh, NI.
02868 632102
0775 665878)
But the game is . . . See if you can spot THE INCREDIBLE DOCUMENT ? Answers to par84colin@hotmail.com . . . . . give you a clue . . . it’s more than one page . . . but you wouldn’t know it from the file . . . which is why it fooled me at 1st. . . What the hell . . . Click here.