Page 1 of 368 results containing "succession london" (0.15 seconds)
Didn't get the results you expected? Help us improve.
I GOT EXACTLY THE RESULTS I EXPECTED THANK YOU
So! . . . You want Denniss Matthews Solicitors, to protect your interests and good name? They can’t even protect their own otherwise they wouldn’t be here.
ON THIS PAGE . .Colin demonstrates his awesome web power . . . Capable of taking on even the big organisations. In a straight fight search on MSN (Google take a time to catch up) . . Unity Trust Bank comes in at No 2 . . and now No 4 too
WEB CRED? . . . I’ll show you web cred. . In just a few days of posting this expose . . . we find the following . . . who else can do this?. . . very few I suspect.
Page 1 of 37,217 results containing unity trust bank (0.08 seconds)
MSN put” this page” at No 2 on a search of Unity Trust Bank . . 48 hours after it was launched. . . .and “Unity Corporate Advisers (Advisors) Ltd Ltd” goes straight in at No 1 and takes over Page 1 . . . see bottom of page
This was unexpected though . . . up to No 2 in 48 hours . . . straight uk search contest . . . unity trust bank . . this search was on page 36 on Sunday. . . . (I know my browser can tend to flatter the results by a few places. . . but even so)
Page 1 of 18 results containing "Unity Corporate Advisers" (0.08 seconds) (with SafeSearch: Moderate)
A bit difficult to flatter this search though . . . This is a full house . . Nearly every result on a search “Unity Corporate Advisers (or Advisors) Ltd ”
YOU WANT TO TRESPASS ON SOMEONE ELSE’S PROPERTY IN CROYDON? . . DIAL 999 . . AND THE MET POLICE CROYDON WILL SEND A SQUAD CAR AND HELP YOU DO IT . . ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS SAY IT’S YOURS . .
NO PROOF NECESSARY.
( if you are black that is . . don’t bother if you are white)
Croydon Council GUILTY of Maladministration found by Ombudsman. Sept 2005
Click here
The Unity Trust Bank - disgraced BIA -Tossers Ingram Winter Green ...
The Unity Trust Bank - disgraced BIA -Tossers Ingram Winter Green - Tower Hamlets Connection John Hayden Chief Executive Mark Oliver Company Secretary From http://www.bianetwork.co.uk/insight ...
www.sir-ian-blair.co.uk/page25.html Cached page 08/02/2006
New in at No 4 . . . . 08.02.2006
These sites were created because Solicitors Ingram Winter Green and Denniss Matthews will not respond to my many letters, and because The Law Society will not investigate all this:-
The reason these sites are still here presumably, is because they are ALL not willing to answer the simple question . . “Did you or did you not conspire with your clients, S J Patel, Nathan & Ruth Teitelbaum of Fineland Properties Ltd, to deliberately LIE, CHEAT and DECEIVE in order to DEFRAUD me of my considerable claims against them?” . . well not in Court anyway. . . lying is one thing . . perjury another. All the content of these sites is based on that premise, and NONE of it has ever been denied or even contested.
For the removal of doubt, I have never called Daniel J Ginsbury “a lying, conniving, scheming piece of pig shit, low life life gutter scum”.
I merely ask the question? If all of the above is true would that make him one? Daniel Ginsbury declines to ans either the former or the latter. It is true that I accuse IWG of being a bunch of total Wankers for allowing these sites to be here and are not able to fathom a way out of this dilemma. Not worthy to call themselves Solicitors in fact.
DISCLAIMER . . Click here
My claims made on this and other web sites are based on the fact that Metcalfe Copeman
& Pettefar
( MCP Law ) refuse to answer even the most basic of questions. They should
have no reason, unless to do so would embarrass them or their clients in disclosure
of lies, connivance, and conspiracy. In exactly the same fashion as the IWG, Denniss
Matthews conspiracy. I have asked them over and over again to tell the truth but
they have declined.
It is reasonable and correct therefore to make the assumptions
that I have and that are printed through out these sites. MCP Law still have the
opportunity to refute these claims if they wish . . . Provided they can prove it
that is. . .
NOTICE TO ALL search engine, ISP’s, Nominet, Hosting Co’s, domain name providers
and the like. ANY adverse legal content on my sites Is AT LEAST ONE YEAR OLD but
more likely 2 years, and therefore is EXEMPT from prosecution in ANY form under UK
Law by virtue of being OUT of STATUTE. Please ignore any threats of legal action.
.They will just be ‘trying it on’..Besides it’s ALL true otherwise they would have
sued me.as per justice.gov.ukGoogle search defamation limitation.Pre-action Protocol
for Defamation In particular, time is always ‘of the essence’ in defamation claims;
the limitation period is (uniquely) only 1 year, .www.justice.gov.uk/civil/procrules_fin/contents/protocols/prot_def.htm
