Page 1 of 676 results containing daniel ginsbury (0.08 seconds)
|
·
|
Daniel Bedingfield CD at Yahoo! - shopping.yahoo.co.uk Compare prices of Daniel Bedingfield CD at Yahoo!, the free shopping price comparison search engine.
|
|
·
|
Daniel Bedingfield CD at Yahoo! - shopping.yahoo.co.uk Compare prices of Daniel Bedingfield CD at Yahoo!, the free shopping price comparison search engine.
|
www.ingramwintergreen.org GOES STRAIGHT IN ON PAGE ONE THE DAY AFTER IT IS LAUNCHED
So! . . . You want Ingram Winter Green Solicitors, to protect your interests and good name? They can’t even protect their own otherwise they wouldn’t be here.
NEW
Croydon Council’s Dirty Tricks Page.
These sites were created because Solicitors Ingram Winter Green and Denniss Matthews will not respond to my many letters, and because The Law Society will not investigate all this:-
The reason these sites are still here presumably, is because they are ALL not willing to answer the simple question . . “Did you or did you not conspire with your clients, S J Patel, Nathan & Ruth Teitelbaum of Fineland Properties Ltd, to deliberately LIE, CHEAT and DECEIVE in order to DEFRAUD me of my considerable claims against them?” . . well not in Court anyway. . . lying is one thing . . perjury another. All the content of these sites is based on that premise, and NONE of it has ever been denied or even contested.
For the removal of doubt, I have never called Daniel J Ginsbury “a lying, conniving, scheming piece of pig shit, low life life gutter scum”.
I merely ask the question? If all of the above is true would that make him one? Daniel Ginsbury declines to ans either the former or the latter. It is true that I accuse IWG of being a bunch of total Wankers for allowing these sites to be here and are not able to fathom a way out of this dilemma. Not worthy to call themselves Solicitors in fact.
DISCLAIMER . . Click here
My claims made on this and other web sites are based on the fact that Metcalfe Copeman
& Pettefar
( MCP Law ) refuse to answer even the most basic of questions. They should
have no reason, unless to do so would embarrass them or their clients in disclosure
of lies, connivance, and conspiracy. In exactly the same fashion as the IWG, Denniss
Matthews conspiracy. I have asked them over and over again to tell the truth but
they have declined.
It is reasonable and correct therefore to make the assumptions
that I have and that are printed through out these sites. MCP Law still have the
opportunity to refute these claims if they wish . . . Provided they can prove it
that is. . .
NOTICE TO ALL search engine, ISP’s, Nominet, Hosting Co’s, domain name providers
and the like. ANY adverse legal content on my sites Is AT LEAST ONE YEAR OLD but
more likely 2 years, and therefore is EXEMPT from prosecution in ANY form under UK
Law by virtue of being OUT of STATUTE. Please ignore any threats of legal action.
.They will just be ‘trying it on’..Besides it’s ALL true otherwise they would have
sued me.as per justice.gov.ukGoogle search defamation limitation.Pre-action Protocol
for Defamation In particular, time is always ‘of the essence’ in defamation claims;
the limitation period is (uniquely) only 1 year, .www.justice.gov.uk/civil/procrules_fin/contents/protocols/prot_def.htm
Colin’s NEW sites
Barnett Ross the no forms required to bid Auctioneers.
Contact Andrew
Mahon NI plaintiff 1’s chief fixer for details.
He knows Steven Grossman so doesn’t
have to fill out all those nasty Money Laundering forms.
Or ANY forms come to that.
www.barnett-ross.co.uk
www.barnettross.org.uk
(Andrew Mahon
3 Pettigo Rd, Kesh,
Co
Fermanagh, NI.
02868 632102
0775 665878)